When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California, other states sue to block Trump executive order ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-other-states-sue...

    The lawsuit is a first for California against the new Trump administration, but likely not the last. ... The 14th Amendment to the Constitution — ratified in 1868 — states that "all persons ...

  3. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruneyard_Shopping_Center...

    Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California Supreme Court in a case that arose out of a free speech dispute between the Pruneyard Shopping Center in Campbell, California, and several local high school students (who wished to canvass signatures for a petition against United ...

  4. Nullification (U.S. Constitution) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_(U.S...

    The Constitution does not contain any clause expressly providing that the states have the power to declare federal laws unconstitutional. Supporters of nullification have argued that the states' power of nullification is inherent in the nature of the federal system. They have argued that before the Constitution was ratified, the states essentially were separate nation

  5. Subject-matter jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject-matter_jurisdiction

    Subject-matter jurisdiction, also called jurisdiction ratione materiae, [1] is a legal doctrine regarding the ability of a court to lawfully hear and adjudicate a case. . Subject-matter relates to the nature of a case; whether it is criminal, civil, whether it is a state issue or a federal issue, and other substantive features of th

  6. Court cracks down on California agency that denied Musk ...

    www.aol.com/news/court-cracks-down-california...

    (The Center Square) – A California court cracked down on the California Coastal Commission for its “prejudicial abuse of discretion” when denying homebuilding permits. The same agency ...

  7. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v...

    While the decision of the Court did not rest on the Fourteenth Amendment, an argument on this ground had been delivered by the defense: That the provisions of the Constitution and laws of California in respect to the assessment for taxation of the property of railway corporations operating railroads in more than one county, are in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution ...

  8. Strauss v. Horton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strauss_v._Horton

    Strauss v. Horton, 46 Cal. 4th 364, 93 Cal. Rptr. 3d 591, 207 P.3d 48 (2009), was a decision of the Supreme Court of California, the state's highest court.It resulted from lawsuits that challenged the voters' adoption of Proposition 8 on November 4, 2008, which amended the Constitution of California to outlaw same-sex marriage.

  9. Why it's been so hard to kill Article 34, California's ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/why-hard-kill-article-34...

    The article is a provision of California's state Constitution that requires voter approval before public housing is built in a community. At the time it passed in 1950, the real estate industry ...