Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The fighting words doctrine, in United States constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1942, the U.S. Supreme Court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in Chaplinsky v.
New Hampshire (1942), the Supreme Court held that speech is unprotected if it constitutes "fighting words". [37] Fighting words, as defined by the Court, is speech that "tend[s] to incite an immediate breach of the peace" by provoking a fight, so long as it is a "personally abusive [word] which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, is, as a ...
During colonial times, English speech regulations were rather restrictive.The English criminal common law of seditious libel made criticizing the government a crime. Lord Chief Justice John Holt, writing in 1704–1705, explained the rationale for the prohibition: "For it is very necessary for all governments that the people should have a good opinion of it."
The following pages contain lists of legal terms: List of Latin legal terms; List of legal abbreviations; List of legal abbreviations (canon law) on Wiktionary: Appendix: English legal terms; Appendix: Glossary of legal terms
David L. Hudson Jr., a legal scholar writing in 2003, over 60 years after the Chaplinsky decision, noted that lower courts "have reached maddeningly inconsistent results" on what is and is not protected by the First Amendment in the area of fighting words. [5]
Slip law; Slippery slope; Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List; Spoliation of evidence; Strike for cause; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Substantial disruption; Substantive due process; Substantive law; Sugar bowl (legal maxim) Suppression of evidence; Suspect classification; Symbolic speech
Consent does not have to be explicit, Tidwell said. All that is needed is “a reasonable belief” that consent was given in words or deed. Here is how the mutual combat statute is written. Sec ...
"Imminent lawless action" is one of several legal standards American courts use to determine whether certain speech is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The standard was first established in 1969 in the United States Supreme Court case Brandenburg v. Ohio. [1] [2]