When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Allahabad High Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahabad_High_Court

    Allahabad High Court as of 2022, has 9.33 lakh cases pending in the fast-track courts of Uttar Pradesh, followed by over 1.04 lakh cases in Maharashtra, 1.02 lakh cases in Tamil Nadu, 71,260 cases in West Bengal and 12,538 cases in Telangana.

  3. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Uttar_Pradesh_v...

    The State of Uttar Pradesh v.Raj Narain (1975 AIR 865, 1975 SCR (3) 333) was a 1975 case heard by the Allahabad High Court that found the Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi guilty of electoral malpractices.

  4. Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultana_Mirza_v._State_of...

    Sultana Mirza & Anr. v. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2020), a decision of the Allahabad High Court, established that the Constitutional Court bears the responsibility of overseeing and upholding both constitutional morality and the rights of citizens, particularly when these rights are endangered solely due to their sexual orientation.

  5. Top Indian fact-checker in court for post calling out ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/top-indian-fact-checker-court...

    On Tuesday, the Allahabad high court briefly heard his petition in a fresh case as police in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh seek his arrest, accusing him of “endangering sovereignty, unity ...

  6. 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Supreme_Court_verdict...

    The Allahabad High Court bench began hearing the case in 2002, which was completed in 2010. After the Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea to defer the High Court verdict, [ 9 ] on 30 September 2010, the High Court of Allahabad, the three-member bench comprising justices S. U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D. V. Sharma, ruled that the disputed ...

  7. Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayodhya_dispute

    The Allahabad high court bench, comprising justices S. U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D. V. Sharma, began hearing the case in April 2002, which it would complete by 2010. [101] In 2003, the Archaeological Survey of India began a court-ordered survey to determine if a temple to Lord Rama existed on the site; the survey said there was evidence of a ...

  8. 2006 Noida serial murders - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Noida_serial_murders

    The book offered alternate viewpoints to the case, suggesting that the Noida Police botched the investigation and that Pandher and Koli were innocent; it also discussed the possibility of an organ-trafficking nexus. In 2023, much of this was corroborated when the Allahabad High Court acquitted Pandher and Koli, referring to a "botched up probe ...

  9. Manju Rani Chauhan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manju_Rani_Chauhan

    Manju Rani Chauhan (born 29 August 1966) is an additional judge of the Allahabad High Court, in Uttar Pradesh, India. [1] She gained public attention in 2019, as she was the judge in several widely publicized cases, including a case concerning allegations of rape against BJP politician Chinmayanand, and a case concerning allegations of illegal acquisition of land against Samajwadi Party ...