Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
There are a number of different definitions of free content in regular use. Legally, however, free content is very similar to open content.An analogy is a use of the rival terms free software and open-source, which describe ideological differences rather than legal ones.
Permissive licenses generally originate in academic institutions like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.. Permissive licenses, also known as academic licenses, [49] allow recipients to use, modify, and distribute software with no obligation to provide source code.
These examples of modern PD software (after the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988) are either under proper public domain (e.g. created by a US governmental organization), under a proper public domain like license (for instance CC0), or accompanied by a clear waiver statement from the author.
The GNU General Public Licenses (GNU GPL, or simply GPL) are a series of widely used free software licenses, or copyleft licenses, that guarantee end users the freedoms to run, study, share, or modify the software. [7]
More than 90 percent of companies use open-source software as a component of their proprietary software. [70] The decision to use open-source software, or even engage with open-source projects to improve existing open-source software, is typically a pragmatic business decision.
In 2000, the "Do What the Fuck You Want To Public License" was released as a public-domain-equivalent license for software. [2]It is distinguished among software licenses by its informal style and lack of a warranty disclaimer.
"Free and open-source software" (FOSS) is an umbrella term for software that is considered free software and/or open-source software. [1] The precise definition of the terms "free software" and "open-source software" applies them to any software distributed under terms that allow users to use, modify, and redistribute said software in any manner they see fit, without requiring that they pay ...
BSD licenses are a family of permissive free software licenses, imposing minimal restrictions on the use and distribution of covered software.This is in contrast to copyleft licenses, which have share-alike requirements.