Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The genetic fallacy (also known as the fallacy of origins or fallacy of virtue) [1] is a fallacy of irrelevance in which arguments or information are dismissed or validated based solely on their source of origin rather than their content. In other words, a claim is ignored or given credibility based on its source rather than the claim itself.
First World problems are a subset of this fallacy. [102] [103] Genetic fallacy – a conclusion is suggested based solely on something or someone's origin rather than its current meaning or context. [104] I'm entitled to my opinion – a person discredits any opposition by claiming that they are entitled to their opinion.
Genetic fallacy; A. Ad hominem; Ad personam; Appeal to accomplishment; Appeal to loyalty; Appeal to motive; Appeal to nature; Appeal to novelty; Appeal to the stone ...
"Human Genetic Diversity: Lewontin's Fallacy" is a 2003 paper by A. W. F. Edwards in the journal BioEssays. [1] He criticises an argument first made in Richard Lewontin's 1972 article "The Apportionment of Human Diversity", that the practice of dividing humanity into races is taxonomically invalid because any given individual will often have more in common genetically with members of other ...
This argument is a form of genetic fallacy; in which the conclusion about the validity of a statement is justified by appealing to the characteristics of the person who is speaking, such as also in the ad hominem fallacy. [17]
Bulverism is a type of ad hominem rhetorical fallacy that combines circular reasoning and the genetic fallacy with presumption or condescension. The Bulverist assumes a speaker's argument is invalid or false and then explains why the speaker came to make that mistake or to be so silly (even if the opponent's claim is actually right) by ...
“This idea of balance, I think is a fallacy and it sets us up for pain, when really, if we just double down on being present and addressing what happens in real-time, we’ll be fine,” the ...
A formal fallacy, deductive fallacy, logical fallacy or non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow") is a flaw in the structure of a deductive argument that renders the argument invalid. The flaw can be expressed in the standard system of logic. [1] Such an argument is always considered to be wrong.