Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A polynomial-time many-one reduction from a problem A to a problem B (both of which are usually required to be decision problems) is a polynomial-time algorithm for transforming inputs to problem A into inputs to problem B, such that the transformed problem has the same output as the original problem.
This is a list of some of the more commonly known problems that are NP-complete when expressed as decision problems. As there are thousands of such problems known, this list is in no way comprehensive. Many problems of this type can be found in Garey & Johnson (1979).
As described in the example above, there are two main types of reductions used in computational complexity, the many-one reduction and the Turing reduction.Many-one reductions map instances of one problem to instances of another; Turing reductions compute the solution to one problem, assuming the other problem is easy to solve.
A polynomial-time counting reduction is usually used to transform instances of a known-hard problem into instances of another problem that is to be proven hard. It consists of two functions f {\displaystyle f} and g {\displaystyle g} , both of which must be computable in polynomial time .
In this case, the proof shows that a solution of Sudoku in polynomial time could also be used to complete Latin squares in polynomial time. [12] This in turn gives a solution to the problem of partitioning tri-partite graphs into triangles, [ 13 ] which could then be used to find solutions for the special case of SAT known as 3-SAT, [ 14 ...
In computational complexity theory, a PTAS reduction is an approximation-preserving reduction that is often used to perform reductions between solutions to optimization problems. It preserves the property that a problem has a polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) and is used to define completeness for certain classes of optimization ...
Karmarkar's algorithm falls within the class of interior-point methods: the current guess for the solution does not follow the boundary of the feasible set as in the simplex method, but moves through the interior of the feasible region, improving the approximation of the optimal solution by a definite fraction with every iteration and ...
If one rounds off some of the least significant digits of the profit values then they will be bounded by a polynomial and 1/ε where ε is a bound on the correctness of the solution. This restriction then means that an algorithm can find a solution in polynomial time that is correct within a factor of (1-ε) of the optimal solution. [26]