Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Else, recursively merge the first ⌊k/2⌋ lists and the final ⌈k/2⌉ lists, then binary merge these. When the input lists to this algorithm are ordered by length, shortest first, it requires fewer than n ⌈log k ⌉ comparisons, i.e., less than half the number used by the heap-based algorithm; in practice, it may be about as fast or slow ...
The classic merge outputs the data item with the lowest key at each step; given some sorted lists, it produces a sorted list containing all the elements in any of the input lists, and it does so in time proportional to the sum of the lengths of the input lists. Denote by A[1..p] and B[1..q] two arrays sorted in increasing order.
If the running time (number of comparisons) of merge sort for a list of length n is T(n), then the recurrence relation T(n) = 2T(n/2) + n follows from the definition of the algorithm (apply the algorithm to two lists of half the size of the original list, and add the n steps taken to merge the resulting two lists). [5]
Ordered pairs are also called 2-tuples, or sequences (sometimes, lists in a computer science context) of length 2. Ordered pairs of scalars are sometimes called 2-dimensional vectors. (Technically, this is an abuse of terminology since an ordered pair need not be an element of a vector space.)
According to the Erdős–Szekeres theorem, any sequence of + distinct integers has an increasing or a decreasing subsequence of length + [7] [8] For inputs in which each permutation of the input is equally likely, the expected length of the longest increasing subsequence is approximately . [9] [2]
A schematic picture of the skip list data structure. Each box with an arrow represents a pointer and a row is a linked list giving a sparse subsequence; the numbered boxes (in yellow) at the bottom represent the ordered data sequence.
Here, the list [0..] represents , x^2>3 represents the predicate, and 2*x represents the output expression.. List comprehensions give results in a defined order (unlike the members of sets); and list comprehensions may generate the members of a list in order, rather than produce the entirety of the list thus allowing, for example, the previous Haskell definition of the members of an infinite list.
It then merges each of the resulting lists of two into lists of four, then merges those lists of four, and so on; until at last two lists are merged into the final sorted list. [24] Of the algorithms described here, this is the first that scales well to very large lists, because its worst-case running time is O( n log n ).