When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DO-178C - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178C

    The Software Level, also known as the Development Assurance Level (DAL) or Item Development Assurance Level (IDAL) as defined in ARP4754 (DO-178C only mentions IDAL as synonymous with Software Level [10]), is determined from the safety assessment process and hazard analysis by examining the effects of a failure condition in the system. The ...

  3. DO-178B - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178B

    The system safety assessments combined with methods such as SAE ARP 4754A determine the after mitigation DAL and may allow reduction of the DO-178B software level objectives to be satisfied if redundancy, design safety features and other architectural forms of hazard mitigation are in requirements driven by the safety analyses. Therefore, DO ...

  4. ARP4761 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARP4761

    This Recommended Practice defines a process for using common modeling techniques to assess the safety of a system being put together. The first 30 pages of the document covers that process. The next 140 pages give an overview of the modeling techniques and how they should be applied. The last 160 pages give an example of the process in action.

  5. Automotive Safety Integrity Level - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_Safety...

    DO-178C and DO-254 define the design assurance objectives that must be accomplished for given DAL. Unlike SIL, it is the case that both ASIL and DAL are statements measuring degree of hazard. DAL E is the ARP4754 equivalent of QM; in both classifications hazards are negligible and safety management is not required.

  6. DO-254 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-254

    EASA wrote a certification memoranda to require the use of DO-254 for all complex electronics within a system, stating that all equipment and CBA with a Design assurance classification of A, B, C or D should meet level D objectives for the equipment and CBA, regardless of the DAL of the system or aircraft function.

  7. UL (safety organization) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UL_(safety_organization)

    The UL enterprise [4] is a global private safety company headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, composed of three organizations, UL Research Institutes, UL Standards & Engagement and UL Solutions. Established in 1894, the UL enterprise was founded as the Underwriters' Electrical Bureau (a bureau of the National Board of Fire Underwriters ), [ 5 ...

  8. Safety integrity level - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_integrity_level

    According to IEC 61508, the SIL concept must be related to the dangerous failure rate of a system, not just its failure rate or the failure rate of a component part, such as the software. Definition of the dangerous failure modes by safety analysis is intrinsic to the proper determination of the failure rate. [citation needed]

  9. UL 94 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UL_94

    UL 94, the Standard for Safety of Flammability of Plastic Materials for Parts in Devices and Appliances testing, is a plastics flammability standard released by Underwriters Laboratories of the United States. [1] The standard determines the material's tendency to either extinguish or spread the flame once the specimen has been ignited.