Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Fairness dilemmas arise when groups are faced with making decisions about how to share their resources, rewards, or payoffs. Since resources are limited, groups need to decide on fair ways of apportioning them out to their members. These fairness judgments are determined by procedural and distributive forms of social justice.
Articles relating to dilemmas, problems offering two possibilities, neither of which is unambiguously acceptable or preferable. See also: Category:Dichotomies Pages in category "Dilemmas"
The term dilemma is attributed by Gabriel Nuchelmans to Lorenzo Valla in the 15th century, in later versions of his logic text traditionally called Dialectica.Valla claimed that it was the appropriate Latin equivalent of the Greek dilemmaton.
Fair division is the problem in game theory of dividing a set of resources among several people who have an entitlement to them so that each person receives their due share. . That problem arises in various real-world settings such as division of inheritance, partnership dissolutions, divorce settlements, electronic frequency allocation, airport traffic management, and exploitation of Earth ...
The fairness doctrine of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints. [1]
The Potter Box focuses on moral issues as opposed to pragmatic or legal ones, such as how to avoid getting sued or fired. With regard to ethics, however, it can be used to reflect on any situation that requires moral decision-making. Its four steps, at least initially, should be followed in order.
Common fairness criteria, such as proportionality and envy-freeness, judge the division from the point-of-view of a single agent, with a single preference relation. There are several ways to extend these criteria to fair division among groups. Unanimous fairness requires that the allocation be considered fair in the eyes of all agents in all ...
Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical" is an essay by John Rawls, published in 1985. [1] In it he describes his conception of justice. It comprises two main principles of liberty and equality; the second is subdivided into fair equality of opportunity and the difference principle .