When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Engblom v. Carey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engblom_v._Carey

    Engblom v. Carey, 677 F.2d 957 (2d Cir. 1982), is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit interpreting the Third Amendment to the United States Constitution for the first time.

  3. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    The Third Amendment is incorporated against the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. And the protection of the Third Amendment applies to anyone who, within their residence, has a legal expectation of privacy and a legal right to exclude others from entry into the premises. This case is notable for being the only ...

  4. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.

  5. Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Film_Corp._v...

    Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 236 U.S. 230 (1915), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling by a 9–0 vote that the free speech protection of the Ohio Constitution, which was substantially similar to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, did not extend to motion pictures.

  6. Ohio Senate goes after Supreme Court’s amendment ruling - AOL

    www.aol.com/ohio-senate-goes-supreme-court...

    As the two-year legislative session nears an end, DeWine could sign House Bill 74, which would now give the attorney general the right to review and certify the title of an amendment.

  7. Ohio Attorney General given until Monday to explain rejection ...

    www.aol.com/news/ohio-attorney-general-given...

    At issue is a Jan. 25 finding by Yost that the proposed constitutional amendment's title — “Ohio Voters Bill of Rights” — was “highly misleading and misrepresentative” of the measur

  8. Ohio’s high court nixes 3rd set of GOP-drawn Statehouse maps

    www.aol.com/news/ohio-high-court-nixes-3rd...

    The Ohio Supreme Court has rejected a third set of Ohio Statehouse district maps that Republicans insisted reflect the state’s partisan breakdown — and sent them back for a fourth try even as ...

  9. Hawke v. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawke_v._Smith

    Hawke v. Smith, 253 U.S. 221 (1920), was a United States Supreme Court case coming out of the state of Ohio.It challenged the constitutionality of a provision in the state constitution allowing the state legislature's ratification of federal constitutional amendments to be challenged by a petition signed by six percent of Ohio voters.