Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
usually indicates that the annotator believes the move to be dubious [2] or questionable but to possibly have merits or be difficult to refute. The "?!" The "?!" may also indicate that the annotator believes the move is weak or deserves criticism but not bad enough to warrant a "?".
False authority (single authority) – using an expert of dubious credentials or using only one opinion to promote a product or idea. Related to the appeal to authority . False dilemma (false dichotomy, fallacy of bifurcation, black-or-white fallacy) – two alternative statements are given as the only possible options when, in reality, there ...
The following is a list of fields of endeavor and concepts that critics believe or have been characterized as having skepticism or scientific skepticism aspects. The definition refers to any concept, method, profession, organization, or person who has ever (including historical) been associated with the concept of critical skepticism.
Lunar effect – the belief that the full Moon influences human behavior. [12] Modern flat Earth beliefs propose that Earth is a flat, disc-shaped planet that accelerates upward, producing the illusion of gravity. Proposers of a flat Earth, such as the Flat Earth Research Society, do not accept compelling evidence, such as photos of Earth from ...
A Constitutionally Dubious California Bill Would Ban Possession of AI-Generated Child Pornography. Jacob Sullum. January 26, 2024 at 4:35 PM ... making it even more constitutionally questionable ...
Hence opportunist behavior is usually regarded at least as questionable or dubious, and at most as unjustifiable or completely illegitimate. Opportunism is regarded as unhealthy, as a disorder or as a character deficiency, if selfishly pursuing an opportunity is blatantly anti-social (involves disregard for the needs, wishes and interests of ...
If a Wikipedia article links to this page, it is due to an editor's concerns regarding the accuracy of statements within that article. Statements causing such concern are marked with the tags [disputed – discuss] or [dubious – discuss]. An editor can insert such a warning by using the templates {{Disputed inline}} or {}.
Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. Such sources include websites and publications expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions. [ 9 ]