When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: vicarious liability with case laws california dmv

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escola_v._Coca-Cola...

    Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal.2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944), was a decision of the Supreme Court of California involving an injury caused by an exploding bottle of Coca-Cola.

  3. Vicarious liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

    Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.

  4. Secondary liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_liability

    One of the theories widely accepted as a basis for liability in copyright infringement cases is vicarious liability. [7] The concept of vicarious liability was developed in the Second Circuit as an extension of the common law doctrine of agency – respondeat superior (the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate ...

  5. Vicarious liability (criminal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_(criminal)

    The general rule in criminal law is that there is no vicarious liability. This reflects the general principle that crime is composed of both an actus reus (the Latin tag for "guilty act") and a mens rea (the Latin tag for "guilty mind") and that a person should only be convicted if they are directly responsible for causing both elements to occur at the same time (see concurrence).

  6. Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_Technology...

    The court refused to impose direct liability on Netcom for making copies. The court first reasoned that in contrast with the MAI case, Netcom did not take any affirmative action that could result in copying of RTC's work. The mere fact that Netcom's system incidentally made temporary copies of plaintiff's work did not mean Netcom had caused the ...

  7. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Visa International Service Ass'n - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_10,_Inc._v._Visa...

    In this case, Perfect 10 sued Visa International, MasterCard International, and several affiliated banks and data processing services, alleging secondary liability under federal copyright and trademark law, secondary liability under California statutory and common law, and violations of California laws proscribing unfair competition and false ...

  8. California DMV apologizes for license plate, car owner's son ...

    www.aol.com/california-dmv-apologizes-license...

    The California DMV apologized for a license plate appearing to mock the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel. The car owner's son said it was being misinterpreted.

  9. United States v. Dotterweich - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Dotterweich

    Laws applied Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Dotterweich , 320 U.S. 277 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld strict , vicarious liability for the president of a company convicted of a public welfare offense .