When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Schenck v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States

    Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917 during World War I.A unanimous Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., concluded that Charles Schenck and other defendants, who distributed flyers to draft-age men urging resistance to induction, could be convicted of an ...

  3. Espionage Act of 1917 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espionage_Act_of_1917

    The Supreme Court disagreed. The Espionage Act limits on free speech were ruled constitutional in the U.S. Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States (1919). [38] Schenck, an anti-war Socialist, had been convicted of violating the Act when he sent anti-draft pamphlets to men eligible for the draft.

  4. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.

    Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. (March 8, 1841 – March 6, 1935) was an American jurist who served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1902 to 1932. [A] Holmes is one of the most widely cited and influential Supreme Court justices in American history, noted for his long tenure on the Court and for his pithy opinions—particularly those on civil liberties and American ...

  5. Shouting fire in a crowded theater - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded...

    The phrase is a paraphrasing of a dictum, or non-binding statement, from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s opinion in the United States Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919, which held that the defendant's speech in opposition to the draft during World War I was not protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United ...

  6. Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._Pro-Choice...

    Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York, 519 U.S. 357 (1997), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court related to legal protection of access to abortion. The question before the court was whether the First Amendment was violated by placing an injunction on protesters outside abortion clinics. The court ruled in a 6–3 ...

  7. Justice Alito denies involvement in alleged 2014 Supreme ...

    www.aol.com/news/justice-alito-denies...

    Conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito on Saturday strenuously denied any involvement in leaking the outcome of a 2014 ruling in a lengthy statement

  8. Freedom of speech in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the...

    For those reasons, this action would not qualify as a protected right under the First Amendment. As Justice Holmes put it in Schenck v. United States (1918), "Even the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing panic. [47]" While free speech is important in our society ...

  9. Ex-Conservative Reverend Testifies That Samuel Alito Leaked ...

    www.aol.com/news/ex-conservative-reverend...

    Rev. Rob Schenck repeated under oath his allegation that Justice Alito leaked the outcome of his 2014 Hobby Lobby decision to a “stealth missionary.” Ex-Conservative Reverend Testifies That ...