Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A few decades ago, screens were less legible than print on paper, but this is no longer true with newer screens. [5] It has been shown that threshold legibility performance correlates inversely with the age of the readers. Older readers are disproportionately affected by other adverse factors in visual design, such as small text size. [9]
Goodhart's law is an adage often stated as, "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure". [1] It is named after British economist Charles Goodhart, who is credited with expressing the core idea of the adage in a 1975 article on monetary policy in the United Kingdom: [2]
Readability is the ease with which a reader can understand a written text.The concept exists in both natural language and programming languages though in different forms. In natural language, the readability of text depends on its content (the complexity of its vocabulary and syntax) and its presentation (such as typographic aspects that affect legibility, like font size, line height ...
This approach, based on formal logic and rules and human-readable representations of concepts, began to take off in the 1950s, but largely reigned from the 1960s until it hit a dead end in the 1990s.
All-caps text is common in comic books, as well as on older teleprinter and radio transmission systems, which often do not indicate letter case at all. [ 5 ] [ 6 ] In professional documents, a commonly preferred alternative to all caps text is the use of small caps to emphasise key names or acronyms (for example, Text in Small Caps ), or the ...
Lisible is a word from the French for 'legible' used to denote a text that requires no true participation from its audience. It was first coined by the French literary critic Roland Barthes in his book S/Z and expanded from his essay "The Death of the Author".
Take the damp cloth from inventory and place it on the form 3 times so it can be legible. It's a form that admitted Charles into a mental institution. The document goes into the book.
Scott shows how central governments attempt to force legibility on their subjects, and fail to see complex, valuable forms of local social order and knowledge. A main theme of this book, illustrated by his historic examples, is that states operate systems of power toward 'legibility' in order to see their subjects correctly in a top-down, modernist, model that is flawed, problematic, and often ...