Ad
related to: 2003 hummer h2 fuel economy reviews
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Hummer H2 is a full-size off ... General Motors was not required to provide official fuel economy ratings for the H2 due to the vehicle's ... 2003 34,529 2004
Hummer H2. The Hummer H2, built on the GMT800 platform, was introduced in late 2002 for the 2003 model year. The H2 was polarizing when introduced and has since gained extremely negative retroactive recognition as well as a negative socio-political image in the United States.
However, when Motor Trend (which placed the 2015 Suburban on the front cover of its June 2014 issue) did a road test review on the SUVs, it estimated the 4WD MPG on the Suburban LTZ to be slightly better at around 15.2 mpg ‑US (15.5 L/100 km; 18.3 mpg ‑imp) city and 22.3 mpg ‑US (10.5 L/100 km; 26.8 mpg ‑imp) highway, while the 4WD ...
Because the H2 is built to the over-8500-lb GVW, its fuel economy is neither published by the U.S. EPA nor counted toward Corporate Average Fuel Economy. [48] For example, H2 in one engine configuration averages an estimated 14 mpg ‑US (17 L/100 km; 17 mpg ‑imp) on the highway and 10 mpg ‑US (24 L/100 km; 12 mpg ‑imp) in the city. [48]
The Hummer H3 is an off-road vehicle that was produced from 2005 to 2010 by General Motors. The smallest model of the Hummer lineup, it was offered as a 5-door SUV or a 4-door pickup truck known as the H3T. Unlike the larger H1 and H2 models, the H3 was not developed by AM General.
2003–2009: Hummer H2: A unique platform (GMT825), the front used a modified 2500-series SUV frame, and the midsection was all-new and completely boxed. The rear section used a 1500-series frame that is modified for the 8,600-pound GVWR. GMT830: 2003–2006 Cadillac Escalade ESV: 2000–2006 Chevrolet Suburban: 2000–2006 GMC Yukon XL: GMT805 ...
In 2003, Car and Driver ... to the 2003 Hummer H2 at 26.5 sq ft (2.46 m 2). The drag area of a bicycle (and rider) ... Improving Aerodynamics to Boost Fuel Economy;
Prices inflation adjusted to 2008 dollars. In 2002, a committee of the National Academy of Sciences wrote a report on the effects of the CAFE standard. [2] The report's conclusions include a finding that in the absence of CAFE, and with no other fuel economy regulation substituted, motor vehicle fuel consumption would have been approximately 14 percent higher than it actually was in 2002.