Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
As explained, a more precise description of a number also specifies the value of this number between 1 and 10, or the previous number (taking the logarithm one time less) between 10 and 10 10, or the next, between 0 and 1.
Mayor of New York DeWitt Clinton appeared on two other versions. [1] The obverse of the 1928 and 1934 series features a portrait of Grover Cleveland facing right while toward a United States Department of the Treasury seal. [2] The reverse of the 1928 and 1934 one-thousand-dollar bills feature lathework and Reverse and a decorative border.
The highest numerical value banknote ever printed was a note for 1 sextillion pengő (10 21 or 1 milliard bilpengő as printed) printed in Hungary in 1946. In 2009, Zimbabwe printed a 100 trillion (10 14) Zimbabwean dollar note, which at the time of printing was worth about US$30. [13]
The decay time for a supermassive black hole of roughly 1 galaxy-mass (10 11 solar masses) due to Hawking radiation is on the order of 10 100 years. [7] Therefore, the heat death of an expanding universe is lower-bounded to occur at least one googol years in the future. A googol is considerably smaller than a centillion. [8]
A natural number in the range of 10 126 and -10 126 is, as well as some larger numbers such as one centillion and one millinillion. zero: Optional. The value to use when the number is 0. Default is "zero" for cardinal numbers, "zeroth" for ordinal numbers.
The interim powers of one thousand between vigintillion and centillion do not have standardized names, nor do any higher powers, but there are many ad hoc extensions in use. The highest number listed in Robert Munafo's table of such unofficial names [ 2 ] is milli-millillion, which was coined as a name for 10 to the 3,000,003rd power.
A list of articles about numbers (not about numerals). Topics include powers of ten, notable integers, prime and cardinal numbers, and the myriad system.
Its seems, based on this article, that a centillion is more than everything but less than infinity. Sean7phil 19:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC) "The total number of atoms (or even subatomic particles) in the entire universe does not even come near to either value of a centillion." A sourceless claim, unprovable at this time, and irrelevant.