Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard.
a list of banned sources that can never be used or should be removed on sight; a list of biased or unbiased sources; a list of sources that are guaranteed to be 100% correct regardless of context; a list of every source that has been discussed; a list of sources that have never been discussed, or whose reliability should be obvious to most editors
Sources American News americannews.com Defunct Published a false story claiming actor Denzel Washington endorsed Donald Trump for U.S. president. The fictional headline led to thousands of people sharing it on Facebook, a prominent example of fake news spreading on the social network prior to the 2016 presidential election. [11] [12] [13] [14]
Here's a checklist to help organize your evaluation of a source. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement.
The perennial sources list is intended for sources that we've repeatedly identified actual problems with, and despite their concerning ownership (classification as generally reliable doesn't preclude WP:WEIGHT) the discussion to classify them here feels preemptive.
Use this template to indicate that some of an article's listed sources may not be reliable. Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Month and year date The month and year that the template was placed (in full). "{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}" inserts the current month and year ...
A caption of "Perennial sources" or "List of perennial sources" should sufficiently describe the table. If there is another list, then differentiate them further in the caption (ex. Allowed list ... vs. Disallowed list ...). If they opt to read the table's content, then the column and/or row headers will help describe the data further.
If an otherwise reliable source attributes information to an unreliable source then that information is likewise unreliable. WP:FOTPT WP:FRUIT WP:POISON WP:POISONOUSFRUIT: Law sources as reliable sources: Some law sources may not be reliable. Others may be very complicated to use. WP:LAWSOURCES WP:LAWSOURCE WP:LAWBOOKS WP:LAWBOOK: Tertiary ...