When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: free home foreclosures in ct

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ebenezer Gay House - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebenezer_Gay_House

    Gay apparently financially supported the war effort to his personal ruin; he died insolvent in 1787, and the house was lost to foreclosure. The house was bequeathed to the Sharon Historical Society by Anne Hoyt in 1951. It now houses the society's collections, with a residential space for a caretaker in the rear ell. [2]

  3. What is a foreclosure? How it works and how to avoid it - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/foreclosure-works-avoid...

    Some of the best ways to avoid a home foreclosure include: ... The U.S. Department of Justice provides a list on its website of legal assistance providers that are either free or low-cost. If you ...

  4. Foreclosure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreclosure

    As per the foreclosure data report of RealtyTrac for January 2014, 1 in every 1,058 homes in U.S. received a foreclosure filing. This figure falls in the higher spectrum of foreclosure frequency. As of August 2014, the foreclosure rate was 33.7%, 1.7% up from the last year.

  5. Preforeclosure: What it is and how it works - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/preforeclosure-works...

    Acting quickly during preforeclosure can help homeowners stay in their homes or avoid foreclosure. Missing a few monthly mortgage payments is a predicament that can happen to almost any homeowner.

  6. How to stop foreclosure - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/stop-foreclosure-220538027.html

    A deed-in-lieu of foreclosure involves turning over your home to a lender to avoid foreclosure proceedings. In some instances, going this route could help you avoid paying the remaining loan ...

  7. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.