Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Jairam Ramesh of INC said Aadhaar should be limited to subsidies only and not made mandatory for any purpose. [16] On 16 March 2016, the bill was returned to the Lok Sabha by the Rajya Sabha with some suggested amendments. The Lok Sabha was free to accept or reject the amendments. [16] But, Lok Sabha rejected the amendments and passed the bill ...
On 3 March 2016, a money bill was introduced in the Parliament to give legislative backing to Aadhaar. [12] On 11 March 2016, the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, benefits and services) Act, 2016, was passed in the Lok Sabha. [13] [14] Aadhaar is the subject of several rulings by the Supreme Court of India.
This is a category of articles concerning acts of Parliament (laws enacted by the Parliament of India in 2016). For more general discussion of Indian legal topics, see Category:Law of India and its other subcategories.
Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, benefits and services) Act, 2016
A large number of people remain without identity documents - poor people especially. In order to include them, identity requirements for Aadhaar have been reduced, however biometric facilities have been provided to reduce or eliminated duplication, so while it may be possible to obtain the card under a false name, it is less likely to be able to obtain another Aadhaar card under a different ...
Tathagata Satpathy has raised concerns that the Aadhaar project could be used for mass surveillance or ethnic cleansing in the future. He has questioned why a new identity card project was created despite having several identity cards systems. He has also criticised the decision to present the Aadhaar Bill, 2016 as a money bill. He pointed out ...
Jasti Chelameswar (born 23 June 1953) is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India.He retired on 22 June 2018 as the second most senior supreme court judge. [2] He previously served as the chief justice of the Kerala High Court from 2010 to 2011 and the Gauhati High Court from 2007 to 2010. [3]
A part of the Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2016, the scheme provides an opportunity to declare unaccounted wealth and black money in a confidential manner and avoid prosecution after paying a fine of 50% on the undisclosed income. An additional 25% of the undisclosed income is invested in the scheme which can be refunded after four ...