Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The defendant never made an appearance on U.S. territory depriving the plaintiffs of one easy avenue of obtaining in personam jurisdiction over the defendant – the simple act of being able to serve process on the defendant while the defendant is visiting and within the territory of the United States (this would be the traditional territorial ...
The situation is different with respect to jurisdictional principles in the international context. The first difference concerns long-arm jurisdiction, which is the statutory grant of jurisdiction to local courts over out-of-state defendants. A long-arm statute authorizes a court in a state to exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.
This jurisdiction permits a court to hear a case against a defendant and enter a binding judgment against a defendant residing outside the jurisdiction concerned. At heart, the constraints on long arm jurisdiction are concepts of international law, and the principle that one country ought not exercise state power over the territory of another ...
The Alien Tort Statute (codified in 1948 as 28 U.S.C. § 1350; ATS), also called the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), is a section in the United States Code that gives federal courts jurisdiction over lawsuits filed by foreign nationals for torts committed in violation of international law.
For example, a defendant may fire a gun, post a package, or write or speak words in State A, but the effects of each action are felt in State B. Some states claim a public policy justification to exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed by, or crimes committed against their citizens, even though these crimes are committed outside their ...
The court decided that there existed specific jurisdiction over the defendants due to their interactions with the plaintiffs via the Internet services operated by eBay. Holding: Personal jurisdiction is established if the criteria of the Calder test are met. Boschetto v. Hansing, 539 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 2008). [22]
The first two – presence of the defendant in the jurisdiction and submission of the defendant to the foreign court – are traditional tests that have their roots in English common law. The third and now most common test, real and substantial connection, was recognized in the Supreme Court of Canada's 1990 decision Morguard Investments Ltd v ...
Some treaties that confer jurisdiction on the ICJ include : American treaty on pacific settlement, Bogotá, 30 April 1948; Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide, Paris, 9 December 1948; Revised act for the pacific settlement of international disputes, Lake Success, 28 April 1949