Ad
related to: ra 9275 fines and penalties for bankruptcy amendment 2 and 5 explained
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford, 295 U.S. 555 (1935), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the Frazier–Lemke Farm Bankruptcy Act was an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause because it interfered with farmers' property rights in contracts they made with the United States. [1]
Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal, 492 U.S. 257 (1989), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable fines does not apply to punitive-damage awards in civil cases when the United States is not a party.
The Bankruptcy (Amendment) Act 1926 (16 & 17 Geo. 5. c. 7) The Bankruptcy Acts 1883 to 1890 was the collective title of the following Acts: [12] The Bankruptcy Act 1883 (46 & 47 Vict. c. 52) The Bankruptcy Appeals (County Courts) Act 1884 (47 & 48 Vict. c. 9) The Bankruptcy (Office Accommodation) Act 1885 (48 & 49 Vict. c. 47) The Bankruptcy ...
Purdue argued—and the bankruptcy court and 2nd Circuit agreed—that three key sections of the bankruptcy code, taken together, authorize a bankruptcy court to grant such releases: sections 105 ...
Most bankruptcy attorneys predicted that this will result in increased attorneys fees and will make attorneys less likely to take on some cases. In addition, bankruptcy filings are now subject to audit in a manner similar to tax returns. Increased compliance requirements for small businesses. The new law increases the bureaucratic compliance ...
Senate agreed to House amendment on October 5, 1978 (agreed) Signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on November 6, 1978 The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 ( Pub. L. 95–598 , 92 Stat. 2549 , November 6, 1978) is a United States Act of Congress regulating bankruptcy .
The cancer victims sought a preliminary order in New Jersey on June 11 to preventing J&J from filing for bankruptcy outside the state, which would have effectively foiled the $6.48 billion ...
A Grant County Superior Court judge ruled in Timbs' favor, finding that the value of the Land Rover was over four times the maximum penalty Timbs could have been fined (US$10,000), and thirty times over the fines he actually paid, and thus was an excessive fine in the context of the Eighth Amendment.