When.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. Restraint of trade - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restraint_of_trade

   A restraint of trade is simply some kind of agreed provision that is designed to restrain another's trade. For example, in Nordenfelt v Maxim, Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co., [2] a Swedish arms inventor promised on sale of his business to an American gun maker that he "would not make guns or ammunition anywhere in the world, and would not ...

3. Template:Free trade agreements - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Free_trade_agreements

   Template: Free trade agreements. ... Download QR code; Print/export Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; Appearance.

4. Template : Free-trade agreements of the United States

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Free-trade...

   To change this template's initial visibility, the |state= parameter may be used: {{Free-trade agreements of the United States | state = collapsed}} will show the template collapsed, i.e. hidden apart from its title bar. {{Free-trade agreements of the United States | state = expanded}} will show the template expanded, i.e. fully visible.

5. Mitchel v Reynolds - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchel_v_Reynolds

   Mitchel v Reynolds (1711) 1 PWms 181 is decision in the history of the law of restraint of trade, handed down in 1711 in England.It is generally cited for establishing the principle that reasonable restraints of trade, unlike unreasonable restraints of trade, are permissible and therefore enforceable and not a basis for civil or criminal liability.

6. United States antitrust law - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law

   Every agreement concerning trade, every regulation of trade, restrains. To bind, to restrain, is of their very essence. The true test of legality is whether the restraint imposed is such as merely regulates and perhaps thereby promotes competition or whether it is such as may suppress or even destroy competition.

7. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addyston_Pipe_&_Steel_Co._v...

   Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. United States, 175 U.S. 211 (1899), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that for a restraint of trade to be lawful, it must be ancillary to the main purpose of a lawful contract. A naked restraint on trade is unlawful; it is not a defense that the restraint is reasonable.