Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Farmland Industries was the largest agricultural cooperative in North America when it eventually sold all of its assets in 2002–04. During its 74-year history, Farmland served its farmer membership as a diversified, integrated organization, playing a significant role in agricultural markets both domestically and worldwide.
The court hearing resulted in a $150,000 total settlement from Wilbur-Ellis Company, $75,000 in civil penalties and another $75,000 for the victims' medical expenses. [3] Aside from the settlement, the Wilbur-Ellis Company agreed to provide safety training for employees using the pesticide.
Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther, 377 U.S. 422 (1964), [1] is a United States Supreme Court decision that extended the repair-reconstruction doctrine of Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. [2] to enhancement of function. Drawing of the patented fish-canning machine involved in this patent infringement lawsuit
Oct. 24—MOSES LAKE — Sunday afternoon a building at the Wilbur-Ellis fertilizer and blending facility, located at 14903 Road 1.3 Southeast, caught fire and burned to the ground. "This facility ...
The many product recalls within the year led Consumer Reports and other observers to dub 2007 "The Year of the Recall.” [1] [2] Events in the confidence crisis included recalls on consumer goods such as pet food , toys , toothpaste and lipstick , and a ban on certain types of seafood .
Its most popular candy, the Wilbur Bud, was introduced in 1893. [9] Hershey's Kiss, which debuted in 1907, closely resembles a Wilbur Bud. The two products are also frequently compared due to the proximity of their manufacturers; Lititz is approximately 20 miles (32 km) from The Hershey Company's global headquarters in Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner: 350 U.S. 46 (1955) Hedging futures gains are ordinary if on raw materials United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp. 350 U.S. 332 (1956) contracts under the Natural Gas Act of 1938: Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co. 350 U.S. 348 (1956) contracts under the Federal Power Act ...
Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther - Supreme Court, 1964. Extended the repair-reconstruction doctrine of Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. - Supreme Court, 1964. Held that state law that, in effect, duplicated the protections of the US patent laws was preempted by federal law.