Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Attorney misconduct is unethical or illegal conduct by an attorney. Attorney misconduct may include: conflict of interest, overbilling, false or misleading statements, knowingly pursuing frivolous and meritless lawsuits, concealing evidence, abandoning a client, failing to disclose all relevant facts, arguing a position while neglecting to disclose prior law which might counter the argument ...
CNN reporter Rishi Iyengar said the case had the potential to be a "watershed moment" for the industry, as it puts not only the male-dominated field in the spotlight but also the practice of drawing on employees' love of gaming rather than paid compensation to coerce extra work out of them (such as during crunch time), a practice that Iyengar ...
Reciprocal with New York State. David E. Harrison: Massachusetts: 2006 — Found to have interfered with the Commission on Judicial Conduct's inquiry of his conduct during a Gloucester, Massachusetts zoning board hearing. [42] Stanley Hilton: California: 2012 — Misconduct [43] Alger Hiss: New York: 1952 1975 Convicted of perjury [44] Abraham ...
Procaccini rejected Neronha's free-speech and separation-of-powers arguments Friday, and instead held firm that Neronha’s "unprofessional," "unethical" and "false" statements clearly violated ...
California law and the FEHA also allow for the imposition of punitive damages [9] [10] when a corporate defendant's officers, directors or managing agents engage in harassment, discrimination, or retaliation, or when such persons approve or consciously disregard prohibited conduct by lower-level employees in violation of the rights or safety of the plaintiff or others.
Susan talks to you for hours on end about herself -- her family, friends, work and play -- but never does she ask about what's happening in your world. Show comments Advertisement
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. The original 1974 decision mandated warning the ...
Need help? Call us! 800-290-4726 Login / Join. Mail