Ad
related to: controversial medical topics for essays
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Intersex topics (8 C, 7 P) L. Lyme disease (1 C, 20 P) M. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (2 C, 36 P) P. ... Pages in category "Medical controversies"
Particularly controversial was the work of Harvard neurosurgeon Vernon Mark and psychiatrist Frank Ervin, who wrote a book, Violence and the Brain, in 1970. [1] The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research in 1977 endorsed the continued limited use of psychosurgical procedures.
Pages in category "Medical controversies in the United States" The following 89 pages are in this category, out of 89 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
In a BMJ study from 2014, for instance, researchers evaluated health claims made on 40 randomly selected episodes of “The Dr. Oz Show,” a syndicated daytime TV show that ran from 2009 to 2022 ...
A 1953 article in the medical/scientific journal Clinical Science [110] described a medical experiment in which researchers intentionally blistered the skin on the abdomens of 41 children, who ranged in age from 8 to 14, using cantharide. The study was performed to determine how severely the substance injures/irritates the skin of children.
Unethical human experimentation is human experimentation that violates the principles of medical ethics.Such practices have included denying patients the right to informed consent, using pseudoscientific frameworks such as race science, and torturing people under the guise of research.
A name that caused a massive shakeup in Milwaukee County's juridical system a year ago has resurfaced in the lead-up to a homicide trial set to start Nov. 6: former Milwaukee County Medical ...
Other terms for such a person include medical clairvoyant, medical psychic, or intuitive counselor. [275] In 2009, Steven Novella, writing on Science Based Medicine, calls medical intuitive diagnosis as "purely magical thinking" and refers to a Huffington Post article about it as "a promotion of a dubious pseudoscientific medical claim". [276]