Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The injunction was initially intended to prevent details of the case – an alleged extra-marital relationship between Giggs and Thomas – from being published in The Sun. [ 1 ] [ 3 ] The ruling of the court was based on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights , which guarantees the right to respect for private and family life.
There are a number of different types of injunction available: Freezing injunctions; Search injunction; Springboard injunctions; Orders directing a party to provide information about the location of property or assets [3] Orders requiring delivery up of property under section 4 of the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 [4]
An injunction can require someone to do something, like clean up an oil spill or remove a spite fence. Or it can prohibit someone from doing something, like using an illegally obtained trade secret. An injunction that requires conduct is called a "mandatory injunction." An injunction that prohibits conduct is called a "prohibitory injunction."
Conclusively in the case of Northern Tanzania Farmers Coop society Ltd v Shelukindo the court stated that "The high court is an organ deriving its establishment and existence by the operation of the constitution of this country. This organ unless otherwise expressly restricted by the legislature has unlimited criminal and civil jurisdiction ...
An order to show cause is a type of court order that requires one or more of the parties to a case to justify, explain, or prove something to the court. Courts commonly use orders to show cause when the judge needs more information before deciding whether or not to issue an order requested by one of the parties. [ 1 ]
The legal order itself is in the form of an injunction, which in Commonwealth jurisdictions is also known as a freezing order, Mareva injunction, Mareva order or Mareva regime, after the 1975 case Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA, [2] although the first recorded instance of such an order in English jurisprudence was Nippon Yusen Kaisha v Karageorgis, [3] decided one ...
An interlocutory injunction was sought by property owners Heah Seok Yeong in the case of Sivaperuman v. Heah Seok Yeong Realty Sdn Bhd in the Federal Court of Malaysia in 1978. Sivaperuman had been dismissed from his work at the Sungei Chinoh Estate in Perak, but had remained in residence on the estate. While the wording in the injunction ...
A super-injunction was granted but later dischargd. [6] DFT v TFD: A super-injunction was granted but later discontinued. [16] Terry v Persons Unknown: Application for a super-injunction was rejected. [17] CTB v News Group Newspapers : Revealed by John Hemming MP using Parliamentary privilege. [18] [19] Andrew Marr and anonymous: Unreported case.