When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: 14th amendment selective incorporation law

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Incorporation of the Bill of Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill...

    t. e. In United States constitutional law, incorporation is the doctrine by which portions of the Bill of Rights have been made applicable to the states. When the Bill of Rights was ratified, the courts held that its protections extended only to the actions of the federal government and that the Bill of Rights did not place limitations on the ...

  3. McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago

    Texas (1894) McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), was a landmark [1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms", as protected under the Second Amendment, is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment and is thereby enforceable against the states.

  4. Adamson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamson_v._California

    Overruled by. Malloy v. Hogan (1964) Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Its decision is part of a long line of cases that eventually led to the Selective Incorporation Doctrine.

  5. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to...

    The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments.Usually considered one of the most consequential amendments, it addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law and was proposed in response to issues related to formerly enslaved Americans following the American Civil War.

  6. Barron v. Baltimore - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barron_v._Baltimore

    Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243 (1833), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in 1833, which helped define the concept of federalism in US constitutional law. The Court ruled that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the state governments, establishing a precedent until the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the ...

  7. Cantwell v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantwell_v._Connecticut

    Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940), is a landmark court decision [1][2] by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment 's federal protection of religious free exercise incorporates via the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and so applies to state governments too. [3]

  8. Gitlow v. New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitlow_v._New_York

    I, XIV; N.Y. Penal Law §§ 160, 161. Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution had extended the First Amendment 's provisions protecting freedom of speech and freedom of the press to apply to the governments of U.S ...

  9. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    The Supreme Court accomplished this by use of a principle known as selective incorporation. In Mapp, this involved the incorporation of the provisions, as interpreted by the Court, of the 4th Amendment, which applies only to actions of the federal government into the 14th Amendment's due process clause. Citing Boyd v.