Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A 2011 test by Phoronix with the default installation of Ubuntu 10.04 showed that LXDE 0.5's memory utilization was lower than that of Xfce 4.6, which in turn was lower than that of GNOME 2.29, with KDE 4.4 using the most RAM compared to the aforementioned desktops. [30] [31]
KWin (KDE) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes LeftWM: Matchbox: EWMH compliance No No Yes Metacity (GNOME) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Mutter (GNOME/MeeGo) Yes Yes Yes Yes Gnome Shell No Yes Moody: Motif Window Manager (mwm) No No Yes No [h] Openbox: Yes Depends [c] Yes Yes Depends [c] No Yes PekWM: Yes No Yes Partial No Yes Yes PlayWM [citation needed ...
These variants include the Xubuntu and Lubuntu distributions for the comparatively light-weight Xfce and LXDE / LXQt desktop environments. The demands that a desktop environment places on a system may be seen in a comparison of the minimum system requirements of Ubuntu 10.10 and Lubuntu 10.10 desktop editions, where the only significant ...
MATE, Cinnamon, KDE 4, XFCE: No Mageia: Binary blobs ext4 systemd KDE Plasma Workspaces, GNOME No Mandriva Linux: Binary blobs ext4 systemd KDE Plasma Workspaces No Manjaro Linux: Binary blobs none [128] systemd Xfce, KDE, GNOME [129] No MEPIS: Binary blobs ext4 sysvinit KDE Plasma Workspaces No MIRACLE LINUX: Binary blobs ext4 systemd GNOME No
Most commonly used lightweight desktop environments include LXDE and Xfce; they both use GTK+, which is the same underlying toolkit GNOME uses. The MATE desktop environment, a fork of GNOME 2, is comparable to Xfce in its use of RAM and processor cycles, but is often considered more as an alternative to other lightweight desktop environments.
Xfce's Xfwm (since 4.2 of 2004 [citation needed] or 2005 Xfce 4.2.0 released!), Unity's Compiz (since 2005—was forked as Beryl in 2006 but the projects re-merged in 2007), and; KDE's KWin (since 4.0 of 2008). Compositing support can be added to non-compositing window managers, through the use of compositors such as compton.
Differences in the look of X Window System in different installations stem mainly from the use of different window managers or from different configurations of the window manager. The window manager takes care of deciding the position of windows, placing the decorative border around them, handling icons, handling mouse clicks outside windows ...
I think that you want more rows than columns for readability, and inverting the table even with OS X and Windows added would still be 6 rows and 14 columns. Only if there's a significant difference between version N and version M of a given desktop environment should there be separate rows for the two versions.