Ad
related to: robertson seymour theorem calculator statistics
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A similar theorem states that K 4 and K 2,3 are the forbidden minors for the set of outerplanar graphs. Although the Robertson–Seymour theorem extends these results to arbitrary minor-closed graph families, it is not a complete substitute for these results, because it does not provide an explicit description of the obstruction set for any family.
Robertson has won the Fulkerson Prize three times, in 1994 for his work on the Hadwiger conjecture, in 2006 for the Robertson–Seymour theorem, and in 2009 for his proof of the strong perfect graph theorem. [11] He also won the Pólya Prize (SIAM) in 2004, the OSU Distinguished Scholar Award in 1997, and the Waterloo Alumni Achievement Medal ...
As the Robertson–Seymour theorem shows, many important families of graphs can be characterized by a finite set of forbidden minors: for instance, according to Wagner's theorem, the planar graphs are exactly the graphs that have neither the complete graph K 5 nor the complete bipartite graph K 3,3 as minors.
Another result relating the four-color theorem to graph minors is the snark theorem announced by Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, and Thomas, a strengthening of the four-color theorem conjectured by W. T. Tutte and stating that any bridgeless 3-regular graph that requires four colors in an edge coloring must have the Petersen graph as a minor. [15]
2004 Robertson–Seymour theorem. The proof takes about 500 pages spread over about 20 papers. 2005 Kepler conjecture. Hales's proof of this involves several hundred pages of published arguments, together with several gigabytes of computer calculations.
Therefore, by the Robertson–Seymour theorem, the linklessly embeddable graphs have a forbidden graph characterization as the graphs that do not contain any of a finite set of minors. [ 3 ] The set of forbidden minors for the linklessly embeddable graphs was identified by Sachs (1983) : the seven graphs of the Petersen family are all minor ...
For example, the Robertson–Seymour theorem guarantees that there is a finite list of forbidden minors that characterizes (for example) the set of graphs that can be embedded on a torus; moreover, Robertson and Seymour showed that there is an O(n 3) algorithm for determining whether a graph has a given graph as a minor.
If a family F of graphs is closed under taking minors (every minor of a member of F is also in F), then by the Robertson–Seymour theorem F can be characterized as the graphs that do not have any minor in X, where X is a finite set of forbidden minors. [42]