Ads
related to: prove that 11 is irrational worksheet printable template
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A more recent proof by Wadim Zudilin is more reminiscent of Apéry's original proof, [6] and also has similarities to a fourth proof by Yuri Nesterenko. [7] These later proofs again derive a contradiction from the assumption that ζ ( 3 ) {\displaystyle \zeta (3)} is rational by constructing sequences that tend to zero but are bounded below by ...
Bertrand's postulate and a proof; Estimation of covariance matrices; Fermat's little theorem and some proofs; Gödel's completeness theorem and its original proof; Mathematical induction and a proof; Proof that 0.999... equals 1; Proof that 22/7 exceeds π; Proof that e is irrational; Proof that π is irrational
Although this has so far not produced any results on specific numbers, it is known that infinitely many of the odd zeta constants ζ(2n + 1) are irrational. [7] In particular at least one of ζ(5), ζ(7), ζ(9), and ζ(11) must be irrational. [8] Apéry's constant has not yet been proved transcendental, but it is known to be an algebraic period ...
He has reproved Apéry's theorem that ζ(3) is irrational, and expanded it. Zudilin proved that at least one of the four numbers ζ(5), ζ(7), ζ(9), or ζ(11) is irrational. [ 2 ] For that accomplishment, he won the Distinguished Award of the Hardy - Ramanujan Society in 2001.
A more general proof shows that the mth root of an integer N is irrational, unless N is the mth power of an integer n. [7] That is, it is impossible to express the m th root of an integer N as the ratio a ⁄ b of two integers a and b , that share no common prime factor , except in cases in which b = 1.
Irrational numbers can also be expressed as non-terminating continued fractions (which in some cases are periodic), and in many other ways. As a consequence of Cantor's proof that the real numbers are uncountable and the rationals countable, it follows that almost all real numbers are irrational. [3]
In 1840, Liouville published a proof of the fact that e 2 is irrational [10] followed by a proof that e 2 is not a root of a second-degree polynomial with rational coefficients. [11] This last fact implies that e 4 is irrational. His proofs are similar to Fourier's proof of the irrationality of e.
Copeland and Erdős's proof that their constant is normal relies only on the fact that is strictly increasing and = + (), where is the n th prime number. More generally, if is any strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers such that = + and is any natural number greater than or equal to 2, then the constant obtained by concatenating "0."