Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In a 4-3 majority decision by Associate Justice Stanley Mosk, the court decided to impose a new kind of liability, known as market share liability.The doctrine evolved from a line of negligence and strict products liability opinions (most of which had been decided by the Supreme Court of California) that were being adopted as the majority rule in many U.S. states.
Also if all defendants were present, then market share liability would be unnecessary, because the plaintiff would be able to apply the doctrine of alternative liability to put the burden of proving causation onto the defendants. Second, the products must be fungible (i.e. interchangeable—they must be of the same composition).
A closely related test is risk-utility test. Traditionally, the risk-utility test was used for design defects, while the consumer expectation test was applied to manufacturing defects. However, some jurisdictions apply the consumer expectation test to design defects as well. See Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp., 2007 WL 495315 (Ill. Feb. 16, 2007).
The California Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA") is the name for California Civil Code §§ 1750 et seq. [1] The CLRA declares unlawful several "methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices undertaken by any person in a transaction intended to result or which results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer". [2]
Generally, the simplest way to think of the risk-utility test is the Hand Formula applied to products. The Third Restatement of the Law, Torts: Products Liability §2(b) [ 1 ] favors the risk-utility test over the Second Restatement of the Law, Torts §402(a), which favored the consumer expectations test . §2(b) states, in part, "A product is ...
Strict liability thus requires manufacturers to evaluate the full costs of their products. In this way, strict liability provides a mechanism for ensuring that a product's absolute good outweighs its absolute harm. [68] Between two parties who are not negligent (manufacturer and consumer), one will necessarily shoulder the costs of product defects.
The Consumer Federation of California is led by Executive Director Robert Herrell and President Richard Holober. [ 2 ] CFC has advocated for medical and financial privacy, the prevention of elder abuse, strengthening food and product safety laws, regulation of private, for-profit colleges, eliminating household toxins, combating false ...
--California State Bar Ethics Opinion 1989-113. Direct adversity may arise in litigation when an attorney sues a client or defends an adversary in an action their client has brought. [ 19 ] It may also arise in the context of business negotiations, when a lawyer negotiates on behalf of an adversary against a current client, even if the matter ...