When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumsfeld_v._Forum_for...

    In Fall of 2003, Forum for the Academic & Institution Rights, Inc. (FAIR), an association of law schools and law faculty asked the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to enjoin enforcement of the Solomon Amendment on the grounds it violated their First Amendment rights to free speech and freedom of association. The ...

  3. Harvey v Facey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_v_Facey

    Harvey v Facey [1893], [1] is a contract law case decided by the United Kingdom Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on appeal from the Supreme Court of Judicature of Jamaica. In 1893 the Privy Council held final legal jurisdiction over most of the British Caribbean. [ 2 ]

  4. Phillips v Eyre - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_v_Eyre

    Exceptionally, the case was heard by a bench of six judges. Willes J gave the decision of the court.. Curiously, much of the case was dedicated not to the double actionability rule for which it would later be cited, but to argument upon whether (i) a law that was retrospective in nature was repugnant to natural justice and (ii) whether the law was defective as a matter of procedure as the ...

  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matsushita_Electric...

    Holding; To survive a motion for a summary judgment, a plaintiff seeking damages for a violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act must present evidence "that tends to exclude the possibility" that the alleged conspirators acted independently, such that the inference of a conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed ...

  6. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_City_Studios...

    Both the district and circuit court rulings were controversial, and have been widely criticized by free speech advocates such as the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, as well as the American Library Association, the author of The Boondocks, [13] and others, due to upholding legal restrictions on expressive programming code.

  7. Reed v. Town of Gilbert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_v._Town_of_Gilbert

    A municipal ordinance that placed stricter limitations on the size and placement of religious signs than other types of signs was an unconstitutional content-based restriction on free speech. Court membership; Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg

  8. Snowden flouts court ruling with paid speeches, Substack: ‘He ...

    www.aol.com/news/snowden-court-ruling-paid...

    Exiled leaker Edward Snowden continues to score several payments for speaking appearances despite a court ruling that placed a permanent injunction on unauthorized speeches.

  9. Terminiello v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminiello_v._City_of_Chicago

    Terminiello v. City of Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a "breach of peace" ordinance of the City of Chicago that banned speech that "stirs the public to anger, invites dispute, brings about a condition of unrest, or creates a disturbance" was unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States ...