When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Batchelder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Batchelder

    United States v. Batchelder, 442 U.S. 114 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, where two statutes criminalize the same act and those statutes have different maximum penalties, the maximum penalty of the statute the prosecutor chose to charge under applies.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 442

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Supreme Court of the United States (www.supremecourt.gov) United States Supreme Court cases in volume 442 (Open Jurist) United States Supreme Court cases in volume 442 (FindLaw) United States Supreme Court cases in volume 442 (Justia)

  4. Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Roofing_Co._v...

    Atlas Roofing Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 430 U.S. 442 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court decision in administrative law.The decision held that the Seventh Amendment to the US Constitution did not require a jury trial to enforce the civil penalties for violating a federal "public rights" statute, allowing enforcement by an administrative agency.

  5. Plyler v. Doe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyler_v._Doe

    Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982), was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States struck down both a state statute denying funding for education of undocumented immigrant children in the United States and an independent school district's attempt to charge an annual $1,000 tuition fee for each student to compensate for lost state funding. [1]

  6. Supreme Court accidentally posts Idaho abortion case document ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-acknowledges...

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday acknowledged that it inadvertently posted online a document related to a pending abortion case, which was obtained by Bloomberg Law before it was removed from the ...

  7. Arkansas v. Sanders - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas_v._Sanders

    Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that, absent exigency, the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police, is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception.

  8. Califano v. Yamasaki - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Califano_v._Yamasaki

    Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided an issue of Federal statutory hearing rights.. Under section 204(a)(1) of the Social Security Act, the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare was allowed to make recoupments of erroneous overpayments of old age, survivors' or disability benefits by deducting from ...

  9. Dunaway v. New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunaway_v._New_York

    Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case that held a subsequent Miranda warning is not sufficient to cure the taint of an unlawful arrest, when the unlawful arrest led to a coerced confession.