When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Everything which is not forbidden is allowed - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything_which_is_not...

    (2) The power of the state serves all citizens and can be only applied in cases, under limitations and through uses specified by a law. (3) Every citizen can do anything that is not forbidden by the law, and no one can be forced to do anything that is not required by a law. The same principles are reiterated in the Czech Bill of Rights, Article 2.

  3. Rule according to higher law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_according_to_higher_law

    The idea of a law of ultimate justice over and above the momentary law of the state—a higher law—was first introduced into post-Roman Europe by the Catholic canon law jurists. [3] "Higher law" can be interpreted in this context as the divine or natural law or basic legal values, established in the international law—the choice depending on ...

  4. Sotomayor's dissent: A president should not be a 'king above ...

    www.aol.com/news/sotomayors-dissent-president...

    In an unsparing dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the Supreme Court allowed a president to become a “king above the law” in its ruling that limited the scope of criminal charges against ...

  5. Rule of law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law

    The idea of the rule of law can be regarded as a modern iteration of the ideas of ancient Greek philosophers, who argued that the best form of government was rule by the best men. [25] Plato advocated a benevolent monarchy ruled by an idealized philosopher king, who was above the law. [25]

  6. Opinion - No one is above the law — except Trump - AOL

    www.aol.com/opinion-no-one-above-law-163000959.html

    We have said that no one is above the law. Justice must turn on the law and the facts, on what the defendant at bar did or didn’t do, not on who he is. Not today.

  7. Supreme Court seems skeptical of Trump's claim of absolute ...

    www.aol.com/news/no-one-above-law-supreme...

    “The text of the Constitution … does not afford the President absolute immunity,” Thomas wrote in 2020. Commentators had speculated about why the court took up the case in the first place.

  8. The Constitution is not a suicide pact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Constitution_is_not_a...

    The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to the written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the ends to the means. [1] [2]

  9. Federalist No. 78 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._78

    The Federalist Papers, as a foundation text of constitutional interpretation, are frequently cited by U.S. jurists, but are not law. Of all the essays, No. 78 is the most cited by the justices of the United States Supreme Court. Federalist No. 78 quotes Montesquieu: "Of the three powers [...], the judiciary is next to nothing." There was little ...