Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In general, multi-objective optimization deals with optimization problems with two or more objective functions to be optimized simultaneously. Often, the different objectives can be ranked in order of importance to the decision-maker, so that objective f 1 {\displaystyle f_{1}} is the most important, objective f 2 {\displaystyle f_{2}} is the ...
This problem can be solved iteratively using lexicographic optimization, but the number of constraints in each iteration t is C(n,t) -- the number of subsets of size t. This grows exponentially with n. It is possible to reduce the problem to a different problem, in which the number of constraints is polynomial in n.
Solution of a travelling salesman problem: the black line shows the shortest possible loop that connects every red dot. In the theory of computational complexity, the travelling salesman problem (TSP) asks the following question: "Given a list of cities and the distances between each pair of cities, what is the shortest possible route that visits each city exactly once and returns to the ...
However, after this problem was proved to be NP-complete, proof by reduction provided a simpler way to show that many other problems are also NP-complete, including the game Sudoku discussed earlier. In this case, the proof shows that a solution of Sudoku in polynomial time could also be used to complete Latin squares in polynomial time. [ 12 ]
The problem for graphs is NP-complete if the edge lengths are assumed integers. The problem for points on the plane is NP-complete with the discretized Euclidean metric and rectilinear metric. The problem is known to be NP-hard with the (non-discretized) Euclidean metric. [3]: ND22, ND23
If the solution to any problem can be formulated recursively using the solution to its sub-problems, and if its sub-problems are overlapping, then one can easily memoize or store the solutions to the sub-problems in a table (often an array or hashtable in practice). Whenever we attempt to solve a new sub-problem, we first check the table to see ...
An optimization problem can be represented in the following way: Given: a function f : A → from some set A to the real numbers Sought: an element x 0 ∈ A such that f(x 0) ≤ f(x) for all x ∈ A ("minimization") or such that f(x 0) ≥ f(x) for all x ∈ A ("maximization").
A key distinction between analysis of algorithms and computational complexity theory is that the former is devoted to analyzing the amount of resources needed by a particular algorithm to solve a problem, whereas the latter asks a more general question about all possible algorithms that could be used to solve the same problem.