Ads
related to: high court case tracking- Explore Pricing Plans
Affordable Law Software Plans
That Fit Your Firm’s Needs
- MyCase 10 Day Free Trial
No Credit Card Required
Get the Most Out of Your Software
- Legal CRM Software
Seamless Client Intake.
Track Your Prospect Pipeline.
- Firm Specific Solutions
See How MyCase Works For Your Firm.
The Key to Law Firm Growth.
- Top Rated Legal Software
Run Your Law Firm Efficiently
Start Your MyCase Free Trial
- Start A MyCase Free Trial
Take Your Firm to the Next Level
Law Firm Efficiency Software
- Explore Pricing Plans
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court is ruling on a series of high-profile issues in the court's 2022-23 term, which runs from October to June. NBC News is tracking decisions. Tracking major Supreme Court cases
United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.
This is a list of cases before the United States Supreme Court that the Court has agreed to hear and has not yet decided. [1] [2] [3] Future argument dates are in parentheses; arguments in these cases have been scheduled, but have not, and potentially may not, take place.
PACER (acronym for Public Access to Court Electronic Records) is an electronic public access service for United States federal court documents. It allows authorized users to obtain case and docket information from the United States district courts, United States courts of appeals, and United States bankruptcy courts.
The most recent action in the case included a proof of service file on Sept. 23, confirming the first set of Cramer’s discovery requests was served to Ottawa County’s legal team.
In a judgment on 20 April 2012, the High Court unanimously dismissed AFACT's appeal and ordered AFACT to pay costs, with iiNet's gross legal expenses said to be approximately $9 million. [47] The High Court confirmed the Federal Court Full Bench decision affirming the first instance decision of Cowdroy, though not supporting all his reasons.
Nearly three decades later, the Court decided United States v. Jones (2012), a case concerning the federal government's installation of a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a suspect's vehicle and its use to continuously monitor that vehicle's location for 28 days. [8] The Court voted 9–0 against the government.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department and TikTok on Friday asked a U.S. appeals court to set a fast-track schedule to consider the legal challenges to a new law requiring China-based ...
Ad
related to: high court case tracking