Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Rutter Group is well known for its Rutter Group Practice Guides, which are written and edited by famous lawyers and judges. [2] Courts have cited these treatises in almost 8,000 legal opinions, and they have been called the 'bible' for litigators.
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California (in case citations, S.D. Cal.) is a federal court in the Ninth Circuit (except for patent claims and claims against the U.S. government under the Tucker Act, which are appealed to the Federal Circuit).
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2017, H.R. 196 [24] The more recent proposals have aimed to redefine the Ninth Circuit to cover California, Hawaii, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands, and to create a new Twelfth Circuit to cover Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
The Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that the order violated the Supremacy Clause and the Instrument of Transfer agreement.
Omega S. A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2008), was a case decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that held that in copyright law, the first-sale doctrine does not act as a defense to claims of infringing distribution and importation for unauthorized sale of authentic, imported watches that bore a design registered ...
On September 22, 2011, President Obama nominated Nguyen to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [12] The Senate confirmed Nguyen by a 91–3 vote on May 7, 2012. [13] She received her commission on May 14, 2012. [5] She is the first Asian-American female to serve as a federal appellate judge. [14]
United States Court of Appeals Building for the Ninth Circuit (enlarged ed.). United States General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service. OCLC 53969361. Ray McDevitt; Ronald M. George, Chief Justice of California (Forward) (2001). Courthouses of California: an Illustrated History.
United States v. Weitzenhoff, 35 F.3d 1275 (9th Cir. 1993) [1] is a legal opinion from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that addresses the confusing mens rea requirement of a federal environmental law that imposed criminal sanctions on certain polluters. [2]