Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Vetting is the process of performing a background check on someone before offering them employment, conferring an award, or doing fact-checking prior to making any decision. In addition, in intelligence gathering , assets are vetted to determine their usefulness.
Online vetting blurs together, a candidate's personal life with their professional livelihood, which blurs defining boundaries that are socially prominent elsewhere. [17] Legal experts have warned human resources departments about vetting prospective employees online, due to the possibility of discrimination and the unreliability of this ...
To widen our pool of prospective good candidates, to raise the quality or our candidates, increase the chance for Requests for Adminship (RfAs) to pass, prevent the RfA process from being quite so toxic, and give some of our most prolific editors some honest feedback, experienced editors are invited to propose possible candidates for “vetting”.
Non-free content is allowed under fair use, but strive to find free alternatives to any media or content that you wish to add to Wikipedia. Since all your contributions are freely licensed to the public , no editor owns any article ; all of your contributions can and will be mercilessly edited and redistributed.
In 1940, Hugh Greene – who later became Director-General of the BBC – was one of the first to undergo its security vetting, as MI5 mistakenly suspected Greene was a communist. [1] Other people who underwent vetting and gained the "Christmas tree" tag on their file included:
National Vetting Center is a United States government agency established on February 6, 2018, to implement "vetting and tighter screening for all individuals seeking to enter the United States in order to help DHS (Department of Homeland Security) and the entire U.S. intelligence community to keep terrorists, violent criminals, and other dangerous individuals from reaching our shores."
But again this vetting must be as transparent as possible with the only way being to keep in on wiki (though there will be the criticism that this is a rehash of Wikipedia:Editor review). Agne Cheese / Wine 19:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Others, such as , argued that moving to a secret ballot would make the vetting process worse: he wrote that doing so would make it "harder to identify reasons for failure, inherently eliminates Cratchats, would require people who were opposing for a non-obvious feature to note the reason so that others could be aware of it, or risk it going ...