Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The other six Millennium Prize Problems remain unsolved, despite a large number of unsatisfactory proofs by both amateur and professional mathematicians. Andrew Wiles , as part of the Clay Institute's scientific advisory board, hoped that the choice of US$ 1 million prize money would popularize, among general audiences, both the selected ...
The definition of a formal proof is intended to capture the concept of proofs as written in the practice of mathematics. The soundness of this definition amounts to the belief that a published proof can, in principle, be converted into a formal proof. However, outside the field of automated proof assistants, this is rarely done in practice.
Fermat's little theorem and some proofs; Gödel's completeness theorem and its original proof; Mathematical induction and a proof; Proof that 0.999... equals 1; Proof that 22/7 exceeds π; Proof that e is irrational; Proof that π is irrational; Proof that the sum of the reciprocals of the primes diverges
It is an important proof technique in set theory, topology and other fields. Proofs by transfinite induction typically distinguish three cases: when n is a minimal element, i.e. there is no element smaller than n; when n has a direct predecessor, i.e. the set of elements which are smaller than n has a largest element;
Proof by exhaustion, also known as proof by cases, proof by case analysis, complete induction or the brute force method, is a method of mathematical proof in which the statement to be proved is split into a finite number of cases or sets of equivalent cases, and where each type of case is checked to see if the proposition in question holds. [1]
Since the proofs generated by automated theorem provers are typically very large, the problem of proof compression is crucial, and various techniques aiming at making the prover's output smaller, and consequently more easily understandable and checkable, have been developed. Proof assistants require a human user to give hints to the system ...
His rather complicated proof was simplified in 1840 by Lebesgue, [109] and still simpler proofs [110] were published by Angelo Genocchi in 1864, 1874 and 1876. [111] Alternative proofs were developed by Théophile Pépin (1876) [112] and Edmond Maillet (1897). [113] Fermat's Last Theorem was also proved for the exponents n = 6, 10, and 14.
In graph-theoretic terms, the theorem states that for loopless planar graph, its chromatic number is ().. The intuitive statement of the four color theorem – "given any separation of a plane into contiguous regions, the regions can be colored using at most four colors so that no two adjacent regions have the same color" – needs to be interpreted appropriately to be correct.