Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The United States DOJ's website on U.S. v. Microsoft; Microsoft's Antitrust Case, Microsoft News Center; Wired news timeline of the Microsoft antitrust case; ZDnet story on 4th anniversary of Microsoft antitrust case; ZDnet story on proposed concessions; Antitrust & the Internet: Microsoft case archive "A Case of Insecure Browsing" by Andrew Chin.
The case, United States v. Microsoft Corp., was heard by the Court on February 27, 2018, with a ruling originally expected by the end of the Court's term in June 2018. [20] While the case was being decided by the Supreme Court, Congress introduced the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act ("CLOUD Act") shortly after the oral hearings ...
Microsoft Corp. v. Baker, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that Federal courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to review a denial of class certification after plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed their claims with prejudice.
In February 2017, a federal judge in Seattle ruled in Microsoft's favor, and the case went forward with a trial date set for June 2018. [5] The judge did not rule on the merits of the case. [ 3 ] In September 2017, Microsoft announced new cloud encryption technology which "could offer an end-run around government secretive snooping by enabling ...
Microsoft Corp. and Activision Blizzard, Inc. is a lawsuit brought against multinational technology corporation Microsoft and video game holding company Activision Blizzard in 2022. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sought a temporary injunction against Microsoft in its effort to acquire Activision Blizzard.
On September 10, 2014 ZDNet reported that Microsoft was held in contempt of court after refusing to hand over foreign data. [9] [10]On December 24, 2014, the Seattle Times reported that the IRS sued former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Craig Mundie, Jeff Raikes, Jim Allchin, Orlando Ayala and David Guenther in an effort to compel them to testify in Microsoft's corporate tax audit.
Microsoft Corp. v. Shah was an Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) case heard before the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Microsoft sued the defendants , Amish Shah and others, for, among other charges, contributory cybersquatting for encouraging others, through videos and software, to infringe ...
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 632 F.3d 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2011), [1] was a patent lawsuit originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island. Both Uniloc and Microsoft utilized a product registration software intended to reduce unauthorized copying of software.