Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The purpose of this page is to centralize information about reliable sources for use by new page reviewers when reviewing new articles. It is intended as a supplement to the reliable sources noticeboard and perennial sources list, to help page reviewers unfamiliar with a given subject assess notability and neutrality of an article––entries should focus on whether a specific publication is ...
The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard.
The person placing the tag does not need to have conducted a search to establish whether or not reliable sources actually exist. Once this article contains at least one bonafide reliable source, this template should be removed from it-- anyone may remove it, including the article's creator, if that condition has been met.
Perennial sources Source Status Discussions Use List Last Summary Occupy Democrats (Washington Press) 2018 2018 2023 2020 2023. 2018 In the 2018 RfC, there was clear consensus to deprecate Occupy Democrats as a source à la the Daily Mail. This does not mean it cannot ever be used on Wikipedia; it means it cannot be used as a reference for facts.
Since the perennial sources list uses table-connected wikitext extensively, it is currently impractical to change a source's status or add a new entry with the VisualEditor. If you normally use the VisualEditor, please switch to "Source editing" mode before editing the list.
Used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement. Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Reason reason Note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip String optional Certain? certain sure ...
Here's a checklist to help organize your evaluation of a source. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement.
The page will reload as it fetches the category. When the page is fully loaded, scroll down a bit to see the page list. Get list of pages in the level 3 Vital list that have one or more specific templates (e.g. {{More citations needed}}, {{WikiProject Spaceflight}}). This guide is similar to the first guide, albeit with some changes.