When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Children's use of information - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children's_use_of_information

    Children recognize that the mental states that they and others may hold are not always reliable means for drawing specific conclusions. 3 and 4 year-olds can also choose the more reasonable of two people and continue to seek, as well as, accept new information from the more credible person (the one who had better reasons in the past).

  3. Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a...

    A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar.

  4. Wikipedia:Children's, adult new reader, and large-print ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Children's,_adult...

    Check the reliability of any children's source, especially a source meant for the youngest audiences but even up through high school levels (some editors may urge checking even up through undergraduate college levels) and especially if the source is to be cited for content of interest primarily to older or adult readers of Wikipedia.

  5. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a Citable Source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_a...

    Research papers, particularly the one research paper students write in their eleventh grade, have always been an integral part of high school education [4].They stress the need to verify information and teach students how to evaluate sources critically, and as a result, teachers have developed various criteria to help students identify credible sources, an especially important skill in the ...

  6. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (science)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  7. Wikipedia:Essays in a nutshell/Verifiability and reliable sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Essays_in_a...

    Essay In a nutshell Shortcuts Impact 1.5 sources: A term that relates to the use of sources that cannot strictly be categorised as being either primary sources or secondary sources. WP:1.5: Low Allowing forensic crime data: If properly used, forensic crime data can be cited as a primary source. WP:FORENSIC WP:CRIMEDATA: Articles with a single ...

  8. Wikipedia:Suggested sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suggested_sources

    WP:BLP - rules about living people, and what not to quote from sources. Other essays: WP:Reliable source examples - general issues to consider. Specific questions: WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - ask about specific sources. However, editors new to a particular topic might not realize some specific major publications are preferred as sources.

  9. Wikipedia:Assessing reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Wikipedia:Assessing_reliability

    Particularly if there are few sources listed, it is a good idea to scan those sources to see if they are reliable. Unreliable sources include most blogs and personal websites, although some of these are reliable. Reliable sources include most newspaper and magazine articles, online encyclopedias, and other professional publications such as books.