When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Permitted comparison of mitigating and aggravating factors to decide death penalty decisions. [3] See also Furman v. Georgia (1972), and Gregg v. Georgia (1976) 1st 1986 Ford v. Wainwright: Preventing the execution [capital punishment] of the insane, requiring an evaluation of competency and an evidentiary hearing 8th 1989 Penry v. Lynaugh

  3. McKinney v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKinney_v._Arizona

    Print/export Download as PDF; Printable version; ... The Court ruled 5–4 that the state appellate court may reweigh the aggravating and mitigating factors. [4 ...

  4. History of the present illness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_present_illness

    Print/export Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; ... modifying factors "A": Aggravating factors "R": Relieving factors

  5. Mitigating factor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitigating_factor

    The Sentencing Council of England and Wales lists the following as possible mitigating factors: [2] Admitting the offense, such as through a guilty plea; Mental illness; Provocation; Young age; Showing remorse; Self-defense is a legal defense rather than a mitigating factor, as an act done in justified self-defense is not deemed to be a crime ...

  6. Dost test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dost_test

    The Dost test is a six-factor guideline established in 1986 in the United States district court case United States v. Dost, 636 F. Supp. 828 (S.D.Cal. 1986). The case involved 22 nude or semi-nude photographs of females aged 10–14 years old.

  7. Forensic psychology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_psychology

    If working as a consultant, a forensic psychologist can be involved in legal proceedings through responsibilities such as reviewing court records (such as a defendant's psychosocial history or assessing mitigating or aggravating factors in a case), serving as a jury consultant (organizing focus groups, shadow juries, mock juries, or helping ...

  8. Behavioral risk - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_risk

    The management of behavioral risk encompass the study of organization and individual behavior from two primary roots: risk management and organizational behavior.With regard to its risk management roots, this type of management analyzes the effect of practices, cultures and behaviors as well as their associated risk of negative outcomes within an individual and/or an organization ().

  9. Risk perception - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_perception

    Factors of risk perceptions. Risk perception is the subjective judgement that people make about the characteristics and severity of a risk. [1] [2] [3] Risk perceptions often differ from statistical assessments of risk since they are affected by a wide range of affective (emotions, feelings, moods, etc.), cognitive (gravity of events, media coverage, risk-mitigating measures, etc.), contextual ...