When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: patent no 6 469 01 23

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Abraham Lincoln's patent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln's_patent

    [2] [22] He described the discovery of America as the most important development in the world's history, followed second by the technology of printing and third by patent laws. [23] Lincoln was himself a patent lawyer. [24] He won an unreported patent infringement case for the defendant early in his legal career titled Parker v. Hoyt.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court trademark case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The Trademark Act of 1905 imports the rules of practice and procedure that govern appeals of patent applications, and so authorizes unsuccessful trademark applicants to obtain a remedy by bill in equity, as the Revised Statutes provide to unsuccessful patent applicants. Prestonettes, Inc. v. Coty: 264 U.S. 359: April 7, 1924: Substantive: Right ...

  4. Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_Price_Competition_and...

    Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act; Long title: An Act to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to revise the procedures for new drug applications, to amend title 35, United States Code, to authorize the extension of the patents for certain regulated products, and for other purposes.

  5. Phillips v. AWH Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_v._AWH_Corp.

    The patent at issue, U.S. Patent No. 4,677,798, was for modular steel shell panels that could be arranged into vandalism resistant walls. The panels interlocked by means of steel baffles - internal barriers meant to create fillable compartments or to deflect projectiles that penetrate the outer wall.

  6. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KSR_International_Co._v...

    On April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, holding that the disputed claim 4 of the patent was obvious under the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §103, and that in "rejecting the District Court’s rulings, the Court of Appeals analyzed the issue in a narrow, rigid manner inconsistent with §103 and our precedents," referring to the Federal Circuit ...

  7. Jerome H. Lemelson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome_H._Lemelson

    Jerome "Jerry" Hal Lemelson (July 18, 1923 – October 1, 1997) was an American engineer, inventor, and patent holder. Several of his inventions relate to warehouses, industrial robots, cordless telephones, fax machines, videocassette recorders, camcorders, and the magnetic tape drive. [1]

  8. Espacenet - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espacenet

    Espacenet (formerly stylized as esp@cenet) [1] [2] is a free online service for searching patents and patent applications. Espacenet was developed by the European Patent Office (EPO) together with the member states of the European Patent Organisation .

  9. Graham v. John Deere Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_v._John_Deere_Co.

    Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified the nonobviousness requirement in United States patent law, [1] set forth 14 years earlier in Patent Act of 1952 and codified as 35 U.S.C. § 103.