Ad
related to: coercive control california family code
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
v. t. e. Abusive power and control (also controlling behavior and coercive control) is behavior used by an abusive person to gain and/or maintain control over another person. Abusers are commonly motivated by devaluation, personal gain, personal gratification, psychological projection, or the enjoyment of exercising power and control. [1]
Isolating a partner from family and friends, controlling their technology and access to technology, and threatening to harm children or companion animals in the household are considered coercive ...
The California Codes are 29 legal codes enacted by the California State Legislature, which, ... Family Code July 13, 1992 Stats. 1992, Ch. 162, pp. 463–722
Coercive control is when one person uses a variety of IPV tactics to control and dominate the other, with little empathy; victims often resist with physical violence. [362] It is generally perpetrated by men against women, and is the most likely of the types to cause trauma bonding [ 363 ] and require medical services.
Reproductive coercion (also called coerced reproduction, reproductive control or reproductive abuse) is a collection of behaviors that interfere with decision-making related to reproductive health. [1] These behaviors are meant to maintain power and control related to reproductive health by a current, former, or hopeful intimate or romantic ...
The Civil Code of California is a collection of statutes for the State of California. The code is made up of statutes which govern the general obligations and rights of persons within the jurisdiction of California. [1] It was based on a civil code originally prepared by David Dudley Field II in 1865 for the state of New York (but which was ...
The current version of the law is codified in sections 6750–53 of the California Family Code and section 1700.37 of the California Labor Code. The law provides that any of the parties may petition a court to approve an entertainment contract, and if the court does so, somewhat different rules apply.
The Lanterman–Petris–Short (LPS) Act (Chapter 1667 of the 1967 California Statutes, codified as Cal. Welf & Inst. Code, sec. 5000 et seq.) regulates involuntary civil commitment to a mental health institution in the state of California. The act set the precedent for modern mental health commitment procedures in the United States.