Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The term "brokered convention" has referred to a convention whose outcome is decided by superdelegate votes, rather than pledged delegates alone, but that is not the original sense of the term and has not been a commonly-used definition for a "contested convention."
On 18 January 2005, Ohio's Secretary of State filed a motion for sanction against the plaintiffs, alleging that the claim in Moss v. Bush was meritless, did not meet the standards of evidence required by law, and was brought only for partisan political purposes. [9] On 19 May 2005, Chief Justice Moyer denied the motion for sanctions. [10]
The Ohio Supreme Court is considering other public records cases that could have sweeping implications for open government. Two cases involve how to interpret Marsy's Law, a voter-approved ...
Later that month, the court issued a ruling clarifying that property taxes could still be used if they were not the primary revenue source for school funding, debts remained valid, and the case would return to the trial judge, but appeals of his decision would bypass the Court of Appeals and go directly back to the Ohio Supreme Court. [27] [28]
The Ohio Supreme Court will convene at 9 a.m. today at Jackson Middle School in Jackson in southern Ohio. The case is expected to be the third of the day and arguments may start around 10 a.m.
The Enquirer challenged a juvenile court judge's decision to seal transcripts arguing the Ohio Constitution forbids blanket sealing of court records.
City of Norwood v. Horney, 110 Ohio St.3d 353 (2006), was a case brought before the Ohio Supreme Court in 2006. The case came upon the heels of Kelo v.City of New London, in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that commercial development justified the use of eminent domain.
In a recent decision involving a Greater Cincinnati school board, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld governmental transparency when it ordered the board to produce a record the board had improperly ...