Ad
related to: examples of divergent thinking questions
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
These types of questions often require students to analyze, synthesize, or evaluate a knowledge base and then project or predict different outcomes. A simple example of a divergent question is: Write down as many different uses as you can think of for the following objects: (1) a brick, (2) a blanket.
Convergent thinking is the opposite of divergent thinking as it organizes and structures ideas and information, which follows a particular set of logical steps to arrive at one solution, which in some cases is a "correct" solution. The psychologist J. P. Guilford first coined the terms convergent thinking and divergent thinking in 1956.
The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, formerly the Minnesota Tests of Creative Thinking, is a test of creativity built on J. P. Guilford's work and created by Ellis Paul Torrance, the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking originally involved simple tests of divergent thinking and other problem-solving skills, which were scored on four scales ...
A series of standard intelligence tests were used to measure both the convergent and divergent thinking abilities of adolescents. Results indicate that subjects who classified as high on divergent thinking had significantly higher word fluency and reading scores than subjects who classified as low on divergent thinking. [15]
Companies that put too much stock in technical training at the expense of “enduring human capabilities—like divergent thinking, emotional agility, [and] resilience—could end up impeding ...
The AUT measures a certain level of divergent thinking; exploring multiple answers using creativity [1] It doesn't compare to a traditional test that looks for a specific solution. [citation needed] As a result, from the AUT it is measured in four ways: [citation needed] Fluency: the number of other uses you can think of, from the original object
Thinking, Fast and Slow is a 2011 popular science book by psychologist Daniel Kahneman. The book's main thesis is a differentiation between two modes of thought : "System 1" is fast, instinctive and emotional ; "System 2" is slower, more deliberative , and more logical .
These are examples of value-based language, or which assign value based on a person's ability to function or perform, often by neurotypical standards. Neurodivergent strengths