Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Separately, game theory has played a role in online algorithms; in particular, the k-server problem, which has in the past been referred to as games with moving costs and request-answer games. [125] Yao's principle is a game-theoretic technique for proving lower bounds on the computational complexity of randomized algorithms , especially online ...
In microeconomics, economies of scale are the cost advantages that enterprises obtain due to their scale of operation, and are typically measured by the amount of output produced per unit of cost (production cost) . A decrease in cost per unit of output enables an increase in scale that is, increased production with lowered cost. [1]
In economics, the law of increasing costs is a principle that states that to produce an increasing amount of a good a supplier must give up greater and greater amounts of another good. The best way to look at this is to review an example of an economy that only produces two things - cars and oranges.
Findings from behavioral game theory will tend to have higher external validity and can be better applied to real world decision-making behavior. [14] Behavioral game theory is a primarily positive theory rather than a normative theory. [14] A positive theory seeks to describe phenomena rather than prescribe a correct action.
As more firms in related fields of business cluster together, their production costs tend to decline significantly (firms have multiple competing suppliers; greater specialization and division of labor). Even when competing firms in the same sector cluster, there may be advantages because the cluster attracts more suppliers and customers than a ...
Marginal cost: The increase in cost caused by an additional unit of production is called marginal cost. By definition, marginal cost (MC) is equal to the change in total cost ( TC) divided by the corresponding change in output ( Q): MC(Q) = TC(Q)/ Q or, taking the limit as Q goes to zero, MC(Q) = lim( Q→0) TC(Q)/ Q = dTC/dQ.
The empirical fact that subjects in most societies contribute anything in the simple public goods game is a challenge for game theory to explain via a motive of total self-interest, although it can do better with the "punishment" variant or the "iterated" variant; because some of the motivation to contribute is now purely "rational" if players ...
Extensive form representation of a two proposal ultimatum game. Player 1 can offer a fair (F) or unfair (U) proposal; player 2 can accept (A) or reject (R). The ultimatum game is a popular experimental economics game in which two players interact to decide how to divide a sum of money, first described by Nobel laureate John Harsanyi in 1961. [1]