Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Until 2013, the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 governed land acquisition in India. The 1894 Act provided compensation to landowners but did not provide any form of compensation to other persons affected by the acquisition. The older law did not clearly define public purpose or fair compensation.
The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (also Land Acquisition Act, 2013 or LARR Act [1] or RFCTLARR Act [2]) is an Act of Indian Parliament that regulates land acquisition and lays down the procedure and rules for granting compensation, rehabilitation and resettlement to the affected persons in India.
While the ruling party has gone all out [5] for acquisition of 997 acres (4.03 km 2) [1] of multi-crop land required for the car factory, questions have been raised about the party forcible acquisition which was made under the colonial Land Acquisition Act of 1894. [1] Others say the provisions of this act were allegedly not been met. [6]
The 1885 Act addressed this, as well included rules laid down in sections 7785 of the British Railways Clauses Consolidation Act 1845. The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 [6] was a comprehensive law enacted in British India. This Act of 1894 is the basis for Indian government's current procedures for land acquisition for public purpose.
The FBISE was established under the FBISE Act 1975. [2] It is an autonomous body of working under the Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training. [3] The official website of FBISE was launched on June 7, 2001, and was inaugurated by Mrs. Zobaida Jalal, the Minister for Education [4] The first-ever online result of FBISE was announced on 18 August 2001. [5]
Timeline of Indian history: Events in the year 1894 in India. Incumbents ... Prisons Act [2] Land Acquisition Act; Births. 1 January ...
The Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Hoardings Act, 1985; The Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978; The Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997; The Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, 1970; The Tamil Nadu Admission in Professional Educational Institutions Act, 2006
Cobell v. Salazar (previously Cobell v.Kempthorne and Cobell v.Norton and Cobell v.Babbitt) is a class-action lawsuit brought by Elouise Cobell and other Native American representatives in 1996 against two departments of the United States government: the Department of Interior and the Department of the Treasury for mismanagement of Indian trust funds.