Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Sources besides Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic should be sought out for films released before the 2000s; reports of critical consensus will likely exist in print sources. E.g., Alien , released in 1979, has a score of 97% on Rotten Tomatoes, but the critical reception at the time of release was mixed.
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 7 February 2025. American review aggregator for film and television Rotten Tomatoes Screenshot Rotten Tomatoes's homepage as of April 1, 2021 Type of site Film and television review aggregator and user community Country of origin United States Owner Warner Bros. Discovery (25%) Comcast (75%) Founder(s ...
Metacritic was launched in January 2001 by Marc Doyle, his sister Julie Doyle Roberts, and his University of Southern California law classmate Jason Dietz, after two years of developing the site. [4] Rotten Tomatoes was already compiling movie reviews, but Doyle, Roberts, and Dietz saw an opportunity to cover a broader range of media.
External links to Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic can be included to provide readers with access to additional reviews in centralized locations. If external links to Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic are already provided in the article's "References" section, it may not be necessary to repeat these links in an "External links" section.
On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 71% of 35 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 6.0/10. [9] Metacritic , which uses a weighted average , assigned the film a score of 59 out of 100, based on 9 critics, indicating "mixed or average" reviews.
On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 86% based on 132 reviews, with an average rating of 7.4/10. The website's critics consensus reads: "With Problemista, Julio Torres' utterly unique sensibilities prove a perfectly cracked lens through which to find the surreal humor in bleak aspects of the human ...
The practice is most commonly aimed at online media review aggregators, such as Steam, Metacritic, IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, or app stores. It may be motivated by unpopular changes to an established franchise, political or cultural controversies related to the product or service, or to the actions of its developers, vendors, or owners. [2]
[31] Metacritic gives the film a score of 94 out of 100, based on reviews from 41 critics, indicating "universal acclaim". [32] It was listed as the third-best film of the year after 12 Years a Slave and Gravity. [40] According to Rotten Tomatoes, it was the second-best reviewed film of 2013 after Alfonso Cuarón's Gravity. [41]